IJE TRANSACTIONS C: Aspects Vol. 31, No. 6 (June 2018) 870-876   

PDF URL: http://www.ije.ir/Vol31/No6/C/2-2812.pdf  
downloaded Downloaded: 108   viewed Viewed: 649

D. Abhigna, M. Ramees and K. V. R. Ravishankar
( Received: September 27, 2017 – Accepted in Revised Form: March 02, 2018 )

Abstract    Uncontrolled intersections are the intersections where there are no external signs or signals to control the movement of vehicles. In mixed traffic conditions priority rules are often violated by the road users. In All-way-stop-controlled intersections (AWSC), the vehicle should stop themselves before they enter the intersection and should check whether any vehicles are present in the other approaches of the intersection. If no vehicle is present, then they can cross the intersection. For this study, data were collected from two uncontrolled three-legged intersections located at various parts of India and critical gap required for each vehicle combination to cross the intersection are extracted. Gap Acceptance method is used for mixed traffic condition because it is based on the critical gap and follow-up time, which in turn depends on the type of vehicles and traffic conditions. This study tries to analyze the effect of vehicle type on gap acceptance behaviour at uncontrolled three-legged intersection. From this study, it is observed that size of the vehicles and traffic volumes has an influence on the critical gap. Depending on the major road vehicle type combinations, the critical gap for each right turning subject vehicle varied from minimum of 1.4 s to a maximum of 8.7s.


Keywords    Gap Acceptance, Critical Gap,Mixed traffic, Uncontrolled Intersections.


چکیده    تقاطع های کنترل نشده تقاطع هایی هستند که در آن نشانه های خارجی یا سیگنال هایی برای کنترل حرکت وسایل نقلیه وجود ندارد. در شرایط ترافیکی مرکب، قوانین اولویت اغلب توسط کاربران جاده ای نقض می شوند. در تقاطع های متقاطع توقف (AWSC)، خودرو باید قبل از ورود به تقاطع، خود را متوقف کند و باید در سایر روش های تقاطع نقشی داشته باشد. اگر هیچ وسیله نقلیه در تقاطع وجود نداشته باشد، آنها می توانند از تقاطع عبور کنند. برای این مطالعه، داده ها از دو تقاطع مستطیلی کنترل نشده سه ناحیه در نقاط مختلف هند جمع آوری شده و شکاف بحرانی مورد نیاز برای هر وسیله نقلیه برای عبور از تقاطع استخراج می شود. روش پذیرش گاف برای شرایط ترافیکی مخلوط استفاده می شود، زیرا بر اساس شکاف انتقادی و زمان پیگیری است که به نوبه خود به نوع وسایل نقلیه و شرایط ترافیک بستگی دارد. در اين تحقيق سعی شده تا اثر نوع خودرو بر رفتار پذیرش شکاف در تقاطع بی نظير سه پا بررسی شود. از این مطالعه مشاهده می شود که اندازه وسایل نقلیه و حجم ترافیک بر شکاف بحرانی اثر می گذارد. بسته به ترکیبات نوع وسیله نقلیه جاده ای، شکاف بحرانی برای هر وسیله نقلیه سوار سوئیچ راست از حداقل 1.4 ثانیه به حداکثر 8.7 ثانیه متغیر است.


1.     Shahi, J. and Amini, B., "The influence of urban network features on the quality of traffic service (research note)", International Journal of Engineering,  Vol. 11, No. 3, 167-174.

2.     Faghri, A., "Signal design at isolated intersections using expert system technology", International Journal of Engineering,  Vol. 8, No. 4, (1995), 181-189.

3.     Vaziri, M., "Traffic flow characteristics of isolated off-ramps in iranian expressways", International Journal of Engineering,  Vol. 11, No. 3, (1994), 135.

4.     HCM, "Em highway capacity manual", in Highway Capacity Manual, SR 209. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., (1994).

5.     HCM, "Em highway capacity manual", in Highway Capacity Manual, SR 209. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., (2000 oe).

6.     Ashalatha, R. and Chandra, S., "Critical gap through clearing behavior of drivers at unsignalised intersections", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,  Vol. 15, No. 8, (2011), 1427-1434.

7.     HCM, "Em highway capacity manual", in Highway Capacity Manual, SR 209. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, (2010).

8.     Kyte, M., Kittelson, W., Zongzhong, T., Brilon, W., Troutbeck, R. and Mir, Z., "New measurements for saturation headways and critical gaps at stop-controlled intersections", in Proceedings Of The Second International Symposium On Highway Capacity, Vol. 1. (1994).

9.     Alexander, J., Barham, P. and Black, I., "Factors influencing the probability of an incident at a junction: Results from an interactive driving simulator", Accident Analysis & Prevention,  Vol. 34, No. 6, (2002), 779-792.

10.   Khattak, A.J. and Jovanis, P.P., "Capacity and delay estimation for priority unsignalized intersections: Conceptual and empirical issues", Transportation Research Record,  Vol., No. 1287, (1990).

11.   Hamed, M., Easa, S. and Batayneh, R., "Disaggregate gap-acceptance model for unsignalized t-intersections", Journal of Transportation Engineering,  Vol. 123, No. 1, (1997), 36-42.

12.   Solberg, P. and Oppenlander, J.C., "Lag and gap acceptances at stop-controlled intersections",  Highway Research Record 118, Highway Research Board, Washington D.C., (1966), 48-67.

13.   Wu, N., "A new model for estimating critical gap and its distribution at unsignalized intersections based on the equilibrium of probabilities", in Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service., (2006), 1-10.

14.   Daganzo, C.F., "Estimation of gap acceptance parameters within and across the population from direct roadside observation", Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,  Vol. 15, No. 1, (1981), 1-15.

15.   Devarasetty, P.C., Zhang, Y. and Fitzpatrick, K., "Differentiating between left-turn gap and lag acceptance at unsignalized intersections as a function of the site characteristics", Journal of Transportation Engineering,  Vol. 138, No. 5, (2011), 580-588.

16.   Raff, M.S., "A volume warrant for urban stop signs",  Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control. Saugatuck, Connecticut, (1950).

17.   Patil, G. and Pawar, D., "Temporal and spatial gap acceptance for minor road at uncontrolled intersections in india", Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,  (2014), 129-136.

18.          Mohan, M. and Chandra, S., "Review and assessment of techniques for estimating critical gap at two-way stop-controlled intersections", European Transport-Trasporti Europei,  No. 61, (2016).

Download PDF 

International Journal of Engineering
E-mail: office@ije.ir
Web Site: http://www.ije.ir