Abstract




 
   

IJE TRANSACTIONS A: Basics Vol. 20, No. 3 (October 2007) 251-262   

PDF URL: http://www.ije.ir/Vol20/No3/A/5-860.pdf  
downloaded Downloaded: 158   viewed Viewed: 1908

  A HOLISTIC APPROACH BASED ON MCDM FOR SOLVING LOCATION PROBLEMS
 
 
A. Kaboli, M. B. Aryanezhad* and K. Shahanaghi

Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology
P.O. Box 16844, Tehran, Iran
kaboli@iust.ac.ir - mirarya@iust.ac.ir - shahanaghi@iust.ac.ir

R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

Engineering Optimization Research Group, Department of Industrial Engineering
Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran
P.O. Box 11365/4563, Tehran, Iran
tavakoli@ut.ac.ir

*Corresponding Author
 
 
( Received: December 25, 2006 – Accepted in Revised Form: September 13, 2007 )
 
 

Abstract    Location decision is an integral part of organizational strategies involving many factorsthat may be conflicting in nature. This paper presents a holistic approach of the multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) methodology to select the optimal location(s), which fits best for both investors andmanagers. A case study is also provided to illustrate the application of the proposed holistic approach.Finally, a comparison with the previous work is made and the informational efficacy of the proposedmodel is also discussed.

 

Keywords    Location Selection, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Fuzzy AHP

 

References   


1. Hoffman, J. and Schniederjans, M., “A two-stage model for structuring global facility site selection decisions”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, (1997), 79-96.

2. Badri, M. and Davis, D., “Decision support models for the location of decision support models for the location of firms in industrial sites”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, (1995), 50-62.

3. Daskin, M. S., “Network and discrete location: Models, algorithms, and applications”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1995).

4.Derzner, Z., “Facility location: A survey of applications and methods”, Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, (1995).

5. Brandeau, M. L. and Chiu, S. S., “An overview of representative problems in location research”, Management Science,Vol. 35, No. 6, (1989), 645-674.

6. Isard, W., “Location and space economy”, Technology Press, MIT, Cambridge, MA, (1956).

7. Hotelling, H., “Stability in competition”, Economic Journal, Vol. 39, (1929), 41-57.

8. Smithies, A., “Optimum location in spatial competition”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 49, (1941), 432-492.

9. Stevens, B. H., “An application of game theory to a problem in location strategy”, Papers of Regional Science Association, Vol. 7, (1969), 85-111.

10. Hakimi, S. L., “Optimal locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph”, Operations Research, Vol. 12, (1964), 450-459.

11. Brown, P. A. and Gibson, D. F., “A quantified model for facility site selection: An application to a multi-facility location problem”, AIIE Transactions, Vol. 4, (1972), 1-10.

12. Buffa, E. S. and Sarin, R. K., “Modern production and operations management”, 8th edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1987).

13.Fortenberry, J. C. and Mitra, A., “A multiple criteria approach to the location-allocation problem”, Computer and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, (1986), 77-87.

14. Kahne, S., “A procedure for optimizing development decisions”, Automatica, Vol. 11, No. 3, (1975), 261-269.

15. Charnetski, J. R., “Multiple criteria decision making with partial information: A site selection problem”, Space Location-Regional Development, Pion, London, (1976), 51-62.

16. Keeny, R. L. and Nair, K., “Selecting nuclear power facility sites in the pacific northwest using decision analysis”, Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, New York, (1977), 298-322.

17. Kirkwood, C. W., “A case history of nuclear power facility site selection”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 33, (1982), 353-363.

18. Linares, P. and Romero, C., “A multiple criteria decision making approach for electricity planning in Spain: Economic versus environmental objectives”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 51, (2000), 736-743.

19. Min, H., “Location planning of airport facilities using the analytic hierarchy process”, Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 30, 1, (1994), 79-94.

20. Yang. J., and Lee, H., “An AHP decision model for facility location selection”, Facilities, Vol. 15, (1997), 241-254.

21. Badri, M. A., “Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal Programming for Global Facility Location-Allocation Problem”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, (1999), 237-248.

22. Liang, G. S. and Wang, M, J., “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for facility site location”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, No. 11, (1999), 2313-2330.

23. Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B. and Mukherjee, S. K., “A new method for facility location selection: A holistic approach”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications, and Practice, Vol. 11, No. 4, (2004), 330-338.

24. Yong, D., “Facility location selection based on fuzzy TOSIS”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 28, (2006), 839-844.

25. Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B. and Shahanaghi, K., “A new method for location selection: A hybrid analysis”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization, (ICMSAO), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, (March, 2007).

26. Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B., Shahanaghi, K. and Niroomand, I., “A mathematical method for location problem: A fuzzy-AHP approach”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Canada, (October, 2007).

27. Kulkarni, M., Nalgirkar, M. and Mital, A., “Quantifying subjective descriptors for the facility location problem”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications, and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 2, (1994).

28. Saaty, T., “The analytic hierarchy process”, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1980).

29. Saaty, T., “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, (1990), 9-26.

30. Dasarathy, B. V., “SMART: Similarity measure anchored ranking- technique for the analysis of multidimensional data analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-6, Vol. 10, (1976), 708-711.

31. Zadeh, F., “The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications”, Interfaces, 16 (4), (1986), 96-108.

32. Van Laarhoven, P. J. M. and Pedrycz, W., “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, (1983), 229-241.

33. Chang, D.-Y., “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 95, (1996), 649-655.

34. Cheng, C.-H., Yang, K.-L. and Hwang, C.-L., “Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, 2, (1999), 423-435.

35. Chan, F. T. S., Chan, M. H. and Tang, N. K. H., “Evaluation methodologies for technology selection”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 107, (2000), 330-337.

36. Chan, F. T. S., Jiang, B. and Tang, N. K. H., “The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 65, No. 1, (2000), 73-84.

37. Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C. and Kao, S. S., “A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 47, No. 2, (2002), 199-214.

38. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. and Ruan, D., “Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy ahp: The case of turkey”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, (2004), 171-184.


Download PDF 



International Journal of Engineering
E-mail: office@ije.ir
Web Site: http://www.ije.ir